Federal filing · U.S. Department of Education

Accredited Into Scarcity

The case for terminating AVMA COE’s federal recognition—and opening veterinary education to independent accreditors that hold competence constant while cutting cost and expanding supply.

NAVEC Policy Report · August 2026 · 33 pages · Updated August 28, 2026

Cover of Accredited Into Scarcity, NAVEC’s federal policy filing on veterinary accreditation
Rule status. This filing addresses the Department of Education’s Accreditation, Innovation, and Modernization proposed rule published August 20, 2026 (91 FR 53940). The report states that comments are due September 21, 2026 and that its evidence is current through August 23, 2026.
$111.8MMean annual spending reported for an AAVMC veterinary college in 2025.
15%Share of mean college revenue supplied by tuition and fees under the incumbent architecture.
$31.1K–$32.1KModeled annual tuition for self-funding three-year DVM programs in NAVEC’s nonprofit planning cases.
Executive summary

The filing in one minute

The report applies the Department’s proposed independence, competition, evidence, cost, and outcomes tests directly to veterinary accreditation.

01

Independence

COE cannot independently validate itself while its governance, administration, and standards remain rooted in the professional guild and incumbent schools.

02

Evidence

COE has not tied its costliest institutional inputs to better day-one clinical outcomes, yet its rules foreclose lower-cost models capable of testing whether those inputs are necessary.

03

Cost and capacity

Fully costed nonprofit planning cases show that tuition-supported schools can operate at materially lower prices without a research enterprise or university-owned teaching hospital.

04

Standards through transition

A protected transition, multiple independent accreditors, common exit gates, and paid provisional practice can expand supply without lowering the licensing standard.

The policy design

The barrier, the alternative, the safeguard

The filing separates the expensive institutional architecture from the competence standard the public actually needs.

The barrier

Outside-capital model

Demand for more seats cannot by itself finance a new school built to an incumbent cost structure in which tuition supplies only a small share of total revenue.

The alternative

Tuition-supported schools

Independent, branch, and integrated BS/DVM models are costed to recover operating expense, reserve, and startup debt entirely from tuition.

The safeguard

Competence, not overhead

Common independent knowledge and clinical gates, followed by paid provisional practice and workplace assessment, protect patients while allowing different educational models to compete.

NAVEC recommendation

What the filing asks the Department to do

Open an immediate recognition-compliance review

Terminate, suspend, or decline renewal of COE’s federal recognition on the present record rather than treating structural independence and proof failures as matters for another paperwork revision.

Protect students while opening the field

Preserve the status of enrolled students and existing graduates through a defined transition, while rapidly recognizing multiple qualified successor accreditors under common public outcome and patient-safety floors.

End state-law exclusivity

States should accept graduates of any federally recognized veterinary accreditor and remove statutory language that makes AVMA COE the exclusive route into the standard licensure pipeline.

What is inside

A complete replacement case—not just a criticism

Independence and proof

Governance, administration, professional perception surveys, the LMU record, and the difference between customary inputs and demonstrated outcomes.

Fully costed school models

Bottom-up budgets for an independent three-year DVM, a three-branch school, and a five-year integrated BS/DVM, including startup financing and paid clinical capacity.

Five years plus paid transition

A direct route from college entry to the DVM, followed by a paid provisional-practice year rather than another tuition-bearing year.

Gatekeeper evidence

The NAVLE, ICVA, ECFVG, the foreign-only CPE standard, supply forecasts, access-to-care effects, and a protected termination-and-transition plan.

Full document

Read the federal filing

The embedded viewer contains the complete 33-page report. The PDF opens separately for easier downloading, printing, citation, and sharing. View the actual filing online ↗

Accredited Into Scarcity

NAVEC Policy Report · August 2026

Open PDF →

This browser cannot display the embedded PDF. Open the complete filing here.

Authorship and scope. NAVEC conducts research and advocacy. It is not an accreditor, school, licensing board, or tuition guarantor. The school and tuition models in the report are transparent policy counterfactuals, not audited school offers.

← Back to Research & Reports